On balance however, it is a scourge that is steadily undermining the livelihoods of large populations in some of the most vulnerable dry agricultural and pastoralist areas. By now there are several attempts to control ‘the mesquite tide’ with mixed results:
In Afar in Ethiopia, the production of charcoal from prosopis was very much encouraged. The problem however is that the prosopis charcoal is inferior to the one from acacia for instance. Instead of prosopis charcoal, the acacia was widely processed – accelerating the degradation of the common land. A total ban on charcoal trading was hence re-invoked in several parts of this region.
In the Tihama in Yemen, a number of entrepreneurial farmers have started to plant acacia ehrenbergiania trees. Rather than using natural stands they use these stands effectively as ‘charcoal plantations’ and also make money with side products of the acacia charcoal making. (See publication: “Setting up Acacia plantations by the Spate Irrigation Network).
Again in the Afar lowlands in Ethiopia Farm Africa has worked on eradicating prosopis in a number of ways. First is to uproot the plants and then very rapidly convert the area in an agricultural area or into a well-managed grazing area – so as not to allow a come back. Secondly is to encourage the regulated production of charcoal through a number of co-operatives. Thirdly is to systematically collect the pods and crush them into animal feed – making sure they do not germinate but are turned into an economic asset. (Read more in “Experiences on Prosopis Management Case of Afar Region” by Farm Africa)
In Sudan mechanical and manual uprooting of prosopis has been promoted. The challenge is not the uprooting as such but to ensure the plant does not make a quick comeback. In one irrigation system an all-out ban on livestock was introduced after the area was cleared. This helped to keep the area ‘clean’. Similarly in the Gash system in Sudan land was given to farmers on the condition that it would be taken back if they could not control the emergence of prosopis.
These are all good openings – but far more needs to be done. In the assessment of the Afar eradication program for instance the area under prosopis expands more than 20 times faster than the area that is brought under productive use. Also menaces such as prosopis have not had much attention from research and development community – and this would need to be changed too.{jcomments on}